What needs to get fixed is my thinking about it. Sadly, every narrative pattern needs to correspond with a unique topic, and I must deal with equivalence of narrative and of topic.
E.g. now I must think of (X) as indicating a sub-narrative on one hand, and topic part of another topic on the other hand. Sadly, I now have to figure out why a sub-topic is equivalent to its container, when the containing "parent" adds no additional parts or attributes, beyond X. Or I have to live with them being different.
Update: This is WRONG. Narratives are too complicated to be topics structures. And ((X)) cannot be another topics from X. Trying to set up topic "equivalence" is a nightmare. Also, the whole point of the ledger is to handle multiple topics. X,Y,Z, .... cannot be a topic, it is a narrative that becomes a ledger. It is like this: a sequence of points is not a point and it is a mistake to think in that direction.
No comments:
Post a Comment