Very little of it seemed to have to do with what I consider narratives, or stories. Sure a Chinese speaker may have some different narratives than me, but we also must have many that are the same and are about the world around us and the insides of our minds. It is precisely those worlds that we share and the common narratives about them that ought to be the proper subject of semantics.
So I slice it and dice it differently from Wikipedia. Form is represented by a proto semantics, as per below. Content is represented by word meanings and the larger mystery: how do words get their meanings?
A PROTO SEMANTICS
Nouns
There
are three kinds
- person (me, or things I lend me-ness)
- thing
- location
- person (me, or things I lend me-ness)
- thing
- location
These
are denoted by single letters or groups of things in parentheses. X, Y, etc.
Adjectives
Two
kinds
-
feeling
(attributed only to persons)
-
attribute
These
are denoted by A,B, etc. To express that a noun X has or feels an adjective A we write:
X__/A
Verbs
These involve a pair
of nouns called actor and target:
actor\target
|
person
|
thing
|
location
|
person
|
love
understand
|
want
assign_value
see
|
go
indicate
find
|
thing
|
cause_to
|
act_on
compare_to
|
in
at
|
location
|
affects
|
contains
on
|
connect_to
|
To
express that a noun X acts on a noun Y we write:
X-->Y
To
express the idea that the same verb occurs in more than one part of a
narrative, superscript the arrow like this ‘-->a‘.
Note
that noun and adjective types are automatically converted by usage. To say “the
dog loves his owner” or “Niagara Falls loves to see tourists at all seasons”
lends personhood to these non-person nouns. Similarly we will be able to put
attribute words in the locations of nouns (e.g. “red is shirt”). Although
almost nonsense, such constructs do carry slight meaning.
Narrative Fragments, Connectors, and
Grouping
Narrative fragments are:
· noun
· noun_/adjective
· noun-->noun
· two narrative fragments joined by a
comma ‘,’. This is a connector that means ‘consecutive’.
· two narrative fragments joined by a
‘::’. This is a connector that means ‘becomes’.
· Any narrative fragment in
parentheses. This means ‘treated as a noun’ or ‘treated as an adjective’
depending on the usage.
· Any narrative fragment in square
brackets. This means ‘implicit’ noun or adjective depending on usage.
Rule of precedence
For simple expressions: ’__/’ ‘-->’ '::' ‘,’ .
Otherwise use parentheses to avoid ambiguity.
Update: Most of the arguments in semantics seems to have to do with whether words can be used in narrative roles that do not match the words' natural definitions. Duh! I realize that there is such a cacophony of nonsense out there about this subject, good new ideas will never be heard, unless they become the basis of commericially successful applications. This seems like a reasonable test, if evaluated in the long term.
Otherwise use parentheses to avoid ambiguity.
Update: Most of the arguments in semantics seems to have to do with whether words can be used in narrative roles that do not match the words' natural definitions. Duh! I realize that there is such a cacophony of nonsense out there about this subject, good new ideas will never be heard, unless they become the basis of commericially successful applications. This seems like a reasonable test, if evaluated in the long term.