Sunday, May 20, 2012
Red shift could be caused by rotation rather than expansion
Saturday, May 19, 2012
The definition of information, the definition of "life"
I think a theoretical physics that fails to subsume theoretical biology must be incomplete. The idea that somehow causality is suspended for that brief moment where "life is created" is just not scientific. Nor, for that matter, would a Deus Ex Machina make any more sense for the big bang "universe is created" moment. One thing at a time though.
Grant me the concept of a clock and here is a definition of information: a sequence of increases and decreases of frequency.
Grant me that definition and here is a definition of life: the preservation and perpetuation of information.
So here is that theological moment: the previous two posts on this blog outline a theoretical physics based on information such that the universe is populated entirely with objects interacting based on the information they maintain. According to this post here, that means life never starts, it is simply the stuff of the universe at different levels of complexity. For the benefit of a colleague at work who was using the word "consciousness", let's agree that everything is conscious of itself and its interactions and that collective conscious is possible.
Properties of a universal simulator
- It can "contain" other simulation objects
- It exposes one or more sequences of frequencies
- It maintains a clock with an update() method called once per tick, and sent to each of its contained simulations.
- the contained simulations must run their clocks in synch with the containing object's clock
A goal is to be able to populate a program with objects by declaring/initializing them, and then have the objects freely interact. But what is a "freely interact" supposed to be like when the classes do not know about each other and the programmer (me or you) does not have access to the header file definitions of the classes in use.
So what is a universal language of interaction? The only answer I can come up with is that when exposed frequencies "match" (in the clock of a containing parent class) energy can be exchanged and some kind of communication can occur between interactors. According to yesterday's post, such a "red-shift event"/interaction would need to generate a new class instance (a new "particle") with the frequency difference of the interactors - spun off as an offspring of the harmony.
I guess I don't want you to think I am another crazed mathematician. But I believe there is almost enough here to start creating prototype simulation class definitions, working programs, and some kind of approach to theoretical physics.
Friday, May 18, 2012
A physics of information and red shift
This red-shift event defines a spatial component between the two particles and I want to say it should be regarded as happening with a certain probability. One last crazy statement is that probably there still needs to be an observed/observer relation in their to cause probabilities to materialize into facts.
[Another discussion with my son that has been going on for years is about the class definition of a universal simulator.]